A packaging line should not begin with a machine catalog.
It should begin with a production flow.
For INNOV projects, the first task is to understand what happens between raw material and finished package.
Only then should the equipment configuration be determined.
Below is a practical engineering workflow for planning the line.
Start with six questions.
1. What is the product?
Rice, coffee beans, powder, pet food, fertilizer granules?
2. What is the physical form?
Granule, powder, liquid or paste?
3. How does it flow?
Free-flowing, sticky, dusty or irregular?
4. Is the product fragile?
5. What is the bulk density?
6. Does the material require special hygiene or cleaning considerations?
This information affects the feeder, weighing method, hopper and machine structure.
The next step is not machine selection.
It is package definition.
Confirm:
For example:
500 g / 220 × 150 mm / Back Seal / Laminated Film
is much more useful for machine selection than simply writing:
“Food Packaging Machine.”
Customers often say:
“I need a fast machine.”
That is not a production specification.
A useful target is:
20–25 finished bags/min at 500 g
Now the feeder, packaging machine, coding and inspection systems can all be matched around the same target.
The product characteristics determine the feeder.
Examples:
Possible solution:
Bucket Elevator / Inclined Feeding System
Possible solution:
Screw Feeder
A gentler customized conveying method may be required.
The goal is stable material supply, not simply maximum feeder speed.
Depending on the bag type and product, the solution may include:
This is where INNOV's packaging equipment forms the core of the complete line.
Confirm the information required on the finished product.
For example:
MFG 2026/10/09
EXP 2027/10/09
LOT A1029
QR Code
Then determine:
This prevents the common problem of trying to squeeze a coder into a finished line.
Possible systems include:
These systems require both space and production-capacity matching.
They should be planned before the factory layout is finalized.
A simple granule line may be:
Feeder → VFFS → Conveyor → TIJ → Checkweigher → Metal Detector → Collection
A more automated system may be:
Feeder → VFFS → Conveyor → Laser/TIJ → Checkweigher → Metal Detector → Vision Inspection → Cartoning → Case Sealing
Every added machine should have a reason.
The objective is not to make the line look complicated.
The objective is to remove a real production bottleneck.
Before final design, confirm:
This is especially important when using elevators or multi-level feeding equipment.
A machine may fit on paper but still be difficult to maintain if there is no service space.
A customer may begin with:
Feeding + Packaging + Conveyor
but later add:
Coding + Checkweigher + Metal Detector + Cartoning
A good layout can reserve enough space and interface capacity for later upgrades.
This avoids rebuilding the entire line.
Coffee Beans
500 g
Pillow Bag / Back Seal
20 Bags/Min
MFG Date + LOT Number
Checkweigher
Z-Type Bucket Elevator → Granule VFFS → Discharge Conveyor → TIJ Coding → Checkweigher → Collection Table
This is a more useful way to describe a production line than listing five unrelated machines.
It shows how each piece of equipment contributes to the complete process.
For a line-design request, provide:
From this information, the line can be evaluated as a system rather than as a collection of products.
An automatic packaging line should be designed by defining the product, package, target output, feeding method, packing process, coding requirement, inspection requirement and factory layout in that order.
Machine selection comes after the production requirements are clear.
That is the fundamental difference between buying equipment and designing a production solution.